Citizen Portal
Sign In

Consultant outlines 24-month plan and staffing costs for Livingston municipal fire department

Livingston City Council · January 7, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A consultant recommended a phased, 24-month transition from county-led services to a municipal Livingston Fire Department, with a 3.0-per-shift staffing model, estimated annual personnel costs of $1.4M–$1.7M, and recommended revenue-sharing negotiations with the county.

A consultant hired to evaluate Livingston’s fire services presented a detailed transition plan to the City Council on Jan. 6, proposing a 24-month phased approach to stand up a municipal Livingston Fire Department while maintaining interim Cal Fire services.

The consultant said the county Board of Supervisors had earlier terminated the county-provided fire services for Livingston in early 2024 and noted the council has taken interim steps — including placing Measure L on the ballot and approving an interim cost-sharing agreement to keep Station 96 open — while planning for a local department.

Key points: the consultant recommended starting with a 3.0 staffing model (three firefighters per shift) — considered the base safe staffing level — with a resident-firefighter pipeline tied to Merced College, a 56-hour work-week structure to limit overtime, and an organizational model using a contracted chief for oversight. Estimated annual personnel costs range from $1.4 million to $1.7 million depending on salary step placement; contracted chief/training services were estimated at $350,000–$450,000.

The consultant summarized funding options the city and finance staff identified: a standing “fire fund” (approximately $1.0 million currently retained by the county through property-tax apportionment), anticipated Measure L receipts estimated at about $2.3 million once fully implemented, and the general fund or unitary fund as council discretion. The consultant also advised pursuing revenue-sharing negotiations with Merced County and other jurisdictions and recommended preserving interim Cal Fire service for continuity during the transition.

"This plan provides a responsible path to do that," the consultant said, framing the approach as phased work to preserve continuity and build local capacity. The mayor summarized current near-term costs and observed that, including past arrangements and recent coverage, the city is effectively paying roughly $1,850,000 annually for fire services in its current mix of county and interim arrangements.

Council direction: the council gave consensus to move forward with the consultant’s recommended next steps (job descriptions, salary schedules, interim-service agreements and revenue-sharing negotiations) but did not take a formal vote to adopt a municipal model that evening. Staff will return with job descriptions, salary ranges and proposed service agreements for council review.