Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Leavenworth County adopts zoning and subdivision amendments; board changes setback measurement to right-of-way edge
Summary
The county approved Resolution 2025-39 adopting multiple amendments to the zoning and subdivision regulations, including changing front-setback measurement from the road centerline to the road right-of-way edge and setting a 75-foot setback standard to create a consistent buffer between roadways and structures.
County planning staff presented case DEB25-132 and recommended a series of targeted amendments to the 2025 zoning and subdivision regulations. The key change approved in Resolution 2025-39 modifies how front setbacks are measured: rather than measuring from the centerline of the road, the county will measure from the edge of the road right-of-way. Staff said this approach produces a consistent buffer between the road right-of-way and structures and minimizes the risk that future road improvements would require purchasing private property rights.
Planner John and staff explained the technical rationale and said a 75-foot measurement from the right-of-way edge aligns with recent plats and is intended to avoid widespread disruption. "The intent of that front setback is to keep separation between the edge of the road right of way and private improvements," staff said. Commissioners asked whether existing nonconforming structures would be grandfathered; staff replied that nonconforming (legal nonconforming) uses can remain, but expansions are subject to current standards.
The discussion also covered administrative 'lot-tie' tools used for small platted lots and whether lot-tie authority should be clarified; staff said the lot-tie is an administrative tool limited to two platted lots within a subdivision (with size restrictions) and that any material change would be referred to the planning commission.
Commissioners also raised whether the changes would create inconsistent standards across the county; staff acknowledged differences exist but said measuring from the right-of-way edge provides greater uniformity than the centerline approach. The board approved Resolution 2025-39 after discussion and a recorded voice vote.
Votes/procedure: Motion to approve the amendments was moved, seconded and carried. Staff indicated follow-up will include drafting any necessary implementation guidance and referring any interpretations or appeals to the planning commission or board of zoning appeals.
