Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Nagpra topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
SIU outlines progress on NAGPRA compliance, vows expanded tribe consultation
Summary
SIU officials told trustees they have identified and notified federal agencies about NAGPRA‑eligible holdings, confirmed federal control over several collections (including 31 human remains previously reported under SIU control) and are intensifying consultation with tribes to meet updated 2024 NAGPRA regulations.
Carol Samara, SIU’s NAGPRA lead, briefed the Board of Trustees on Dec. 4 on the university’s work to comply with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act and its updated regulations.
Samara summarized the legal duty under NAGPRA (Title 25, U.S. Code) and explained SIU’s collecting units — the Sharp Museum (Carbondale), the University Museum (Edwardsville), the Pearson Museum (School of Medicine) and, centrally, the Center for Archaeological Investigations (CAI) — and the broad definition of holdings subject to the law. She reported that SIU timely notified federal agencies this year and that federal agencies have asserted or confirmed control for numerous collections, including 31 Native American individuals previously reported as under SIU control. That shift means federal agencies now carry primary responsibility for those collections’ repatriation processes.
Samara told trustees the updated 2024 regulations emphasize consultation and that SIU is increasing outreach to tribes and reallocating resources across museum and repository units to meet the compliance obligations. She framed NAGPRA work as both a legal duty and an institutional opportunity to strengthen trust and partnerships with tribal nations.
Trustees and executive leadership thanked Samara for the progress and asked questions about the relationship between land/people acknowledgements and the statutory repatriation process. Samara clarified that land or people acknowledgements are distinct from NAGPRA’s requirements, which pertain to human remains and cultural items held by institutions.
Why it matters: NAGPRA imposes federal obligations on institutions that receive federal funds and hold potentially affiliated remains or cultural items. SIU’s actions affect tribal sovereign interests and require government‑to‑government consultation; progress and resourcing will shape timelines for inventories and repatriation.
What’s next: SIU will continue direct outreach to tribes, inventory work in partnership with federal agencies where control was confirmed, and resourcing of collecting units to complete consultations and returned items where appropriate.
