Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Civic Engagement Youth topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates youth advisory board proposal, opts to defer action and seek alternatives
Summary
Councilmember Jay Wegemont proposed a youth advisory board for ages 16–21; legal and staff concerns about minors, vetting and staffing led the council to decline a vote and ask for a more detailed written framework or alternative engagement approaches.
Councilmember Jay Wegemont asked the council to consider creating a Youth Advisory Board to bring youth perspectives into municipal decision-making. Wegemont’s proposal called for a five-member board composed of residents ages 16–21 and envisioned the board advising the council pursuant to the town charter.
Legal counsel and staff raised operational concerns: parental permission for minors, background checks and vetting for advisors, staff time and training (youth-protection and Open Meetings Act compliance) and the administrative burden of making a volunteer, minor-based body comply with municipal rules. The solicitor noted that minors raise additional standards for advisors and staff liaisons and that the town would need to budget for training and possibly a dedicated staff liaison.
Council members discussed alternatives. Several suggested partnering with local schools (teacher liaisons or the civics club), holding periodic youth engagement events (a youth day or summit) or inviting student groups to designated council sessions rather than creating a formal advisory board.
Outcome: Councilors agreed not to vote on the current formal proposal. Instead they asked the proposer to provide a written framework with mission, bylaws and staffing proposals and encouraged exploring less formal engagement options in the near term.
Quote: On the original proposal, Wegemont said the board would be "structured to have 5 members, to be from the age of 16 to 21, and to act under the authority of advising the council."
