Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Curriculum Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public commenter pushes teaching creationism; board attorney outlines limits in policy 2215

Lehi School Board · December 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A public commenter urged teaching creationism alongside evolution; the board attorney clarified that policy 2215 contains statutory language and that the local board previously decided classroom instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity "may not occur" in Highlands County schools, citing Florida statutes.

During public comment and later board discussion, Larry Oldfield argued that CPALM life-science standards and the teaching of evolution lack empirical evidence and urged the district to permit teaching creationism in classrooms as an alternative. "Remember to keep Christ in Christmas," he said in closing comments; he also invoked Florida statutory language in support of his view.

Board members sought clarification about which policy Oldfield referenced; Oldfield pointed to policy 2215 (Program of Instruction). The Board Attorney responded with a point-by-point clarification: the policy pulls statutory language into its text and also contains a separate local board decision that states, "classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in Highlands County Schools in pre-kindergarten through grade 12." The attorney cited Florida Statutes (including §1001.428(c)(3), and related sections §1003.42 and §1003.46) and noted there is required instruction (for example, in grades 6–12 around abstinence and teen pregnancy consequences) that the board has approved through a third-party vendor in prior years.

The transcript records a clarification that the policy language combining statutory text and a board decision reflects a local policy decision "that was not statutory language" but rather "something that you all decided." The board did not amend the policy at the meeting; it authorized advertisement to consider revisions and the attorney recommended that the board rely on the existing statutory references and the local decision language already included in policy 2215.

No policy change was adopted at this meeting; the board scheduled or authorized further consideration through the advertised-policy process.