Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Administration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission adopts alternate 2026 schedule, approves LUAC appointments and minutes

Monterey County Planning Commission · January 15, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Monterey County Planning Commission approved the Jan. 14 consent calendar including several LUAC appointments, accepted the Dec. 10 minutes (with one abstention), and adopted an alternate 2026 meeting schedule that removes the second July meeting.

At its Jan. 14, 2026 meeting the Monterey County Planning Commission handled routine business: commissioners approved the Dec. 10, 2025 meeting minutes (motion recorded and carried; Commissioner Gomez abstained), confirmed several land use advisory committee appointments and adopted an alternate 2026 meeting calendar.

The consent calendar included appointments of Antonio Diaz to the Castroville Land Use Advisory Committee; Servideo Shankar to the Carmel Unincorporated Highlands LUAC; Judith Riley to the Toro LUAC; and Ethan Dunton Coburn to the South Coast LUAC. The commission approved the consent appointments by voice vote; no public comments or letters were recorded on those items.

Staff presented Exhibit A, an alternate 2026 calendar that removes the second July meeting to align the commission schedule with the Board of Supervisors’ summer recess and give staff a midyear opportunity for process improvements. Commissioners discussed a single‑month shift in November to avoid Veterans Day and voted to adopt Exhibit A after a motion by Commissioner Gomez and a second by Commissioner Wirk. Exhibit C (planning commission rules) was provided for reference and the chair said appointment of a nominating committee for chair/vice chair will be agendized at a subsequent meeting.

These procedural votes were taken by voice; the transcript records the motions and that they "carried" but does not include a roll‑call tally for each vote.