Citizen Portal
Sign In

LSBME staff warn interstate OT compact could allow out-of-state licensees without background checks

Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners Occupational Therapy Advisory Committee · January 10, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

LSBME staff told the advisory committee that aspects of the proposed interstate occupational-therapy compact could permit practitioners from some states to practice in Louisiana without state criminal-background checks. Staff said a proposed alternative failed by a 14–13 vote in the compact commission and that the issue remains unresolved pending further agency, gubernatorial or legislative action.

LSBME staff updated the Occupational Therapy Advisory Committee on implementing an interstate licensure compact for occupational therapists and assistants and raised legal and public-safety concerns about parts of the compact as currently written.

Staff said the Board is integrating initial compact users through an API but identified two main problems: (1) the compact’s data requests included Social Security numbers and other demographic information in bulk, which LSBME staff said would violate Louisiana law unless transmitted individually and securely; and (2) some compact member states cannot conduct criminal-background checks, which could allow out-of-state practitioners to practice in Louisiana without the checks Louisiana law requires. Staff said they proposed an alternative—allowing Louisiana to perform its own criminal-background checks for incoming compact licensees—but that the compact commission rejected that alternative in a close, 14–13 vote.

LSBME staff said the issue remains unresolved and that implementation will continue while staff request reconsideration; they added that ultimate resolution may require action by the governor or the legislature. The advisory committee did not take an enforcement action but was informed of the legal and technical constraints the agency faces while joining the compact.

The update is an operational briefing rather than a policy decision by the advisory committee; staff characterized the compact discussion as ongoing and dependent on broader compact governance or state-level action.