Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Senior Property Tax Credits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners direct staff to model lowering senior tax‑credit ages, consider sunsetting a low‑use credit
Summary
After a detailed staff briefing on three senior property tax credits, commissioners asked staff to analyze fiscal impacts of lowering age eligibility to 65 for two credits and to consider sunsetting the least‑used 65/10 credit; staff will return with numbers for budget planning.
Get email alerts on the Senior Property Tax Credits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County legal staff presented an overview of three senior property tax credits and sought direction from the commissioners on potential amendments and codification.
Deputy County Attorney John Sterlinghauser summarized the programs: a county match to the Maryland homeowners property tax credit (county supplement for applicants the state determines eligible), the county’s senior cap tax credit (which freezes county taxes for qualifying residents age 70 and older), and a 2017 locally enacted 65/10 credit that provides limited relief to long‑term residents or retired military.
Staff reported there are about 1,450 aggregate claimants receiving roughly $800,000 in total relief across the three programs; the senior cap program accounts for most participation (about 1,090 claimants). Commissioners discussed whether to codify the county match program, lower the age threshold from 70 to 65 for the cap and the county match, and to sunset the 65/10 program because it has low utilization.
Treasurer Krista Kelly and finance staff said a consolidated application process already assigns the most valuable credit for eligible applicants and that staff can model the fiscal impact of lowering age and other eligibility criteria. Commissioners asked for a short turnaround: staff was asked to return in a few weeks with projections on how lowering eligibility to 65 for the county cap and matching credit would affect county finances and claimant counts.
No formal ordinance or adoption occurred; commissioners provided direction to staff to prepare fiscal analyses for consideration during upcoming budget discussions.

