Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves controversial downtown Blocks 5 & 20 project with view‑corridor condition
Summary
After extensive public comment and a brief recess for applicant‑council negotiation, Oceanside Council approved the Blocks 5 & 20 mixed‑use project (373 units across two buildings) by a 3‑2 vote with a condition to preserve building‑to‑building separation on residential floors to protect Pier View Way sightlines.
The council conducted a lengthy public hearing on a two‑building mixed‑use project for Blocks 5 and 20 in downtown Oceanside that would replace long‑standing surface parking with 373 residential units (193 units in an 8‑story building on Block 5; 180 units in a 7‑story building on Block 20), roughly 17,000–18,000 square feet of commercial space, 38 deed‑restricted affordable units (10% density bonus setaside), and a proposed 560 parking stalls.
Staff (Principal Planner Manuel Baez) summarized entitlements, density bonus provisions, and a list of requested waivers (setbacks, open space per unit, height, parking dimensions and others). The applicant (Daniel Bridal, Bridal Companies) outlined community outreach, design revisions (increased retail, landscaping, murals, pedestrian enhancements), and commitments including private bike storage (80 stalls), bike repair amenities, a payment of $9,395,000 for loss of Lot 20 parking, and a voluntary offer to provide up to roughly 25,000 cubic yards of suitable excavated sand for beach replenishment pending agency approvals.
Public comment was mixed: business owners and some residents supported downtown activation and additional housing; preservation advocates and adjacent residents objected to extensive waivers, loss of public plaza space, reduced ground‑level public access, and potential impacts to Pier View Way view corridors. Councilmembers expressed particular concern about view corridor protections and the relocation of plaza space to private upper levels rather than ground level.
During deliberations the council paused for a short recess for staff and applicant to negotiate an additional condition. Post‑break staff read a mutually agreed condition requiring that the residential floors (3rd floor and above) maintain a building‑to‑building separation equivalent to the measured distance between Mission Pacific and Wyndham at Pier View Way, with balcony projections limited to 5 feet into the setback. With that condition on the record, the council approved the project 3‑2 (Councilmembers Figueroa, Robinson and Weiss in favor; Mayor Sanchez and Deputy Mayor Joyce opposed).
