Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

County cites 'lack of going concern,' places fiscal expert with Burbank Unified

January 16, 2026 | Burbank, Los Angeles County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

County cites 'lack of going concern,' places fiscal expert with Burbank Unified
The Burbank Unified School District on Jan. 15 received a formal explanation from the Los Angeles County Office of Education that it had designated the district as a “lack of going concern,” citing prolonged vacancies and breakdowns in business operations.

Octavio Castello, representing the county, told the school board the designation followed an unusually large number of vacancies in the district’s business office — including the chief business official — and noted ongoing reviews in payroll and facilities. The county has assigned a fiscal expert to be onsite at least weekly to work directly with district staff and advise the board, he said.

David Wilson, the county’s financial reviewer, told trustees the county’s review of the district’s first interim report raised three central concerns: declining enrollment that reduces state funding, ongoing deficit spending as COVID relief funds wane, and unsettled labor negotiations with potential fiscal impact. He urged the board to treat those as forward‑looking risks rather than evidence of immediate cash insolvency.

Superintendent Dr. [Macias], who introduced the visitors, said the district currently holds a positive interim certification but must heed the county’s warnings. Board members and the superintendent discussed the terms of the county fiscal expert’s engagement: the district will reimburse LACOE for 75% of certain short‑term technical assistance and the county will seek reimbursement for the remainder, the presenters said.

Trustees asked for clarity about the scope and duration of the county role. Octavio Castello said the fiscal expert has authority to participate in closed sessions, direct timelines, and in some circumstances to stay or rescind board actions. The county expert said his engagement is intended to build capacity and that the county will scale back involvement if internal controls and staffing stabilize.

The board did not take formal action to contest the designation at the meeting. Trustees said they welcomed the county’s assistance and pledged further work to address internal control weaknesses and staffing gaps. The board also directed staff to continue providing updates to the public and to return with a timeline for follow‑up work with the county office.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal