Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council debates private‑property speed bumps after noncompliant installations; seeks legal review

Lancaster County Committee of the Whole · January 15, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council discussed asphalt speed bumps installed on private parking lots that may not meet international fire code standards; members asked the county attorney to research jurisdiction, penalties and possible waivers, and suggested contacting state legislators for changes.

Lancaster County council members debated installations of speed bumps and other traffic calming measures on private property after staff reported several sites with asphalt humps that may not meet fire‑safety standards.

Councilman Willis raised the issue after receiving reports of noncompliant speed bumps in parking lots used by churches, schools and apartment complexes. He said the fire marshal's office will work with property owners but that devices must meet standards to avoid damage and allow emergency access.

"Any kind of traffic calming under the international fire code, which the state legislature says we have to enforce," a staff member said, noting the fire marshal's enforcement responsibilities under state law. Several council members countered that private property owners should have the ability to protect children and clients and asked for clarity on whether the county can or should regulate private parking lots.

Council asked the county attorney to research the issue, including penalties and whether waivers or legislative changes would be required to allow some private uses to retain speed bumps. Members also suggested reviewing other local examples and engaging state delegates if statutory changes are necessary.

The item concluded with a request for a legal report; no ordinance or enforcement action was decided at the meeting.