Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Procedural topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Simsbury planning commission amends agenda, confirms minutes and nominates alternate; staff schedules sign forum and proposes bylaw updates
Summary
At the Dec. 9 meeting commissioners unanimously approved an agenda amendment, accepted minutes and nominated an alternate to the regional planning commission; staff announced a community sign forum and proposed changes to the 1993 bylaws, including eliminating a secretary role and creating a vice-chair.
The Simsbury Planning Commission unanimously approved a motion to amend the agenda, accepted the Dec. 9 meeting minutes and nominated a local resident (identified in the record as "Nick") as the town’s alternate to the regional planning commission (referred to in the transcript as CROG). The votes were recorded without opposition.
Votes at a glance - Agenda amendment to add CROG alternate discussion (motion introduced SEG 065): approved unanimously. - Approval of Dec. 9 regular meeting minutes (motion introduced SEG 117): approved unanimously. - Nomination of 'Nick' as alternate to CROG Regional Planning Commission (motion introduced SEG 211): approved unanimously.
Bylaws: staff provided commissioners with a strike-through and a clean draft of suggested changes to the commission’s 1993 bylaws and asked members to bring comments to the next meeting. Staff suggested two substantive procedural adjustments in the draft: eliminate the separate secretary position and create a vice-chair role, and standardize timing for officer elections (for example, following municipal elections). Staff said the draft is based on common language used by other boards and commissions in town and invited written comments prior to the next meeting.
Sign code and public forum: Planning staff announced a community sign forum described in the record as occurring "on the 20th" (the transcript alternately referenced the '20th', '20 seventh' and '20 ninth'). The forum will cover how temporary sign rules apply to multi-tenant properties and business owners, and staff warned that the current sign code in the record may not be content-neutral under recent U.S. Supreme Court guidance and therefore carries legal risk. Staff recommended revising the code to treat temporary signs consistently across categories to reduce constitutional exposure.
Next steps: Staff will circulate the bylaws redline and clean draft to commissioners, and the clerk will follow up on formalizing the nominated alternate for the regional planning commission. The sign-code forum will be held as announced; staff encouraged commission members to attend and to provide feedback on bylaw changes before the next meeting.
