Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission hears wide-ranging public-works updates; Live Oak Drive bid recommended with contingency

Liberty County Board of Commissioners · January 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Public-works staff reviewed multiple projects including rights-of-way, pressure testing of a water line, paving schedule adjustments, and a recommended award to J.W. Oliver for Live Oak Drive at $2,428,920 plus a $79,010 water change order and 10% contingency, while commissioners discussed city cost-sharing for water-line work.

County public-works staff briefed commissioners on a slate of road and infrastructure projects and sought direction on timing and funding for high-cost items.

Staff reported field work and interlocal coordination on Saint John's Road and Butterblunt rights-of-way, completion of pressure testing on the Pecan Lane water line, an unexpectedly high bid of $322,000 for Freeman Grove Road (one bidder), and a decision to defer Bankstown Road paving due to weather.

On Live Oak Drive, staff said they received a low bid from J.W. Oliver for $2,428,920. Staff noted that the contract does not include about $79,010 of additional water-line work, which would require a change order, and recommended entering a contract with a 10% contingency. Commissioners pressed for clarity on how to fund the overage and discussed seeking participation from the City of Hinesville because parts of the affected water line are city-owned; staff agreed to pursue city coordination and to ask the contractor for an extension to keep the bid active until the February 3 meeting if additional funding details can be compiled.

The board discussed the risks of approving work that intersects city-owned water lines and asked staff to return with a clearer funding package. No formal contract award was made at the meeting; staff were directed to pursue funding commitments and potential city participation before final award.