Speakers urge action on family-court due process, courthouse security and fire marshal authority
Loading...
Summary
Three registered public speakers asked the court to investigate family-court practices, requested access to public meeting recordings and raised concerns about the county fire marshal’s authority and records access; commissioners heard the requests and noted they will follow up where appropriate.
During public comment the court heard from three registered speakers who raised distinct concerns and requested follow-up.
Tara Jacobs told the court she had observed what she described as due-process problems in some family-court proceedings, including the use of associate-judge reports as enforceable final orders and what she characterized as deficient evidentiary practices. She asked the court to address family-court civil procedures with the same scrutiny some commissioners have applied to criminal-court performance.
Michelle Wiginton asked the court about access to recordings, saying she was quoted a $55 fee for a recording of a public meeting and that she had experienced an incident involving courthouse security eight months earlier that remained unresolved with the district attorney’s office. Michael Wittington criticized the fire marshal’s office, questioning why dozens of peace-officer-style arrests or reports are being handled administratively and asking when the county will hold a public hearing about the marshal’s enforcement authorities and record-keeping.
Commissioners acknowledged the speakers and — where appropriate — encouraged follow-up from county staff and the district attorney’s office. No formal actions were taken during open session on these public comments; the court proceeded to closed session for posted items.
