Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Collective Bargaining topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Springfield council votes to enter executive session on teacher-transition bargaining
Summary
The Springfield City Council voted to enter executive session under Massachusetts law to discuss collective bargaining strategy with the Springfield Education Association over transitioning employees from ZEP schools to district-controlled innovation schools; the public meeting will reconvene at 6:30 p.m.
The Springfield City Council voted to enter an executive session to discuss collective bargaining strategy with the Springfield Education Association, a motion moved by Vice Chair Miss Monroe Naylor and seconded by Miss Gresham.
Miss Monroe Naylor said, "I make a motion, mister mayor, that we go into executive session pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws, chapter 30A, section 21(a)(3) to discuss strategy with respect to collective bargaining as an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the bargaining position of the public body and the chair so declares." She added that the union "demands a bargain regarding transition of employees working in the ZEP schools to schools under local district control innovation schools." The motion was seconded by Miss Gresham.
The clerk conducted a roll call vote. Recorded responses in the transcript include Miss Valentin, Miss Crawford, Mister Gomez Jr., Miss Gresham and Miss Monroe Naylor voting to approve the motion; Miss Hurst was recorded absent. The chair or clerk announced that the matter passed. The public portion of the meeting recessed so members could meet in executive session; the body stated it would reconvene for its regularly scheduled public meeting at 6:30 p.m.
The motion invoked Massachusetts General Laws, chapter 30A, section 21(a)(3), the statute that permits a public body to enter executive session for certain collective bargaining deliberations when public discussion could harm the public body's bargaining position. The transcript does not record further public debate on bargaining positions, proposed terms, financial impacts or any commitment of terms; those details are not specified in the public record provided.
The council did not announce a follow-up schedule for public disclosure about the outcome of bargaining talks in the available transcript. The next listed procedural step was reconvening the regularly scheduled meeting at 6:30 p.m.
