Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Permits Inspections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Drainage board says Core Code subdivision has not filed permit application; staff to follow up
Summary
Board members reported that Core Code had not submitted a required permit application and that developer representatives had not responded since the last meeting; the board identified likely contractors and municipal inspectors and agreed to further outreach.
Get email alerts on the Permits Inspections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Scott County Drainage Board on Jan. 15, 2026, discussed the Core Code subdivision and noted the developer had not completed a permit application and had been unresponsive to board staff.
Speaker 4 told the board, “They have not filled out an application,” and said the developer’s team had not communicated since the board’s previous meeting. Board members described site progress as “pretty far along,” noting framing and active work on at least one side of the site.
Why it matters: the board handles drainage-related permits and inspections that affect erosion control, stormwater management and downstream property impacts. Without a filed application the board cannot consider or approve permit details nor document mitigation measures.
Discussion details and next steps: speakers identified likely contacts for outreach. Speaker 4 said “Chase is always in the communication” and the board agreed Speaker 1 could call Chase directly. The transcript records discussion about which municipal inspector covers the site: Speaker 4 stated the site is in the city of Austin for permitting purposes and identified that Bobby Wilson would inspect in a different jurisdiction; Speaker 4 then named Tyler Peterson as the relevant inspector for the project. The board agreed to attempt additional outreach if the developer remains unresponsive.
What the board did not record: the transcript contains no filed-application number, no permit ID, no formal enforcement action, and no formal deadline for the developer to respond. The board recorded only its agreement to continue outreach and to attempt contact with Chase and Tyler Peterson as next steps.
Quotations from the meeting are drawn directly from the transcript and are attributed to the speakers as recorded.

