Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wildlife Food Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Vermont wildlife officials tell House committee hunting and fishing boost food security; department outlines expanded seasons and deer‑management steps
Summary
Commissioner Jason Batchelder told the House committee that regulated hunting, fishing and related programs contribute to household food security and an estimated $6 million in conservative 'cost avoidance.' He described expanded urban archery zones, new season adjustments and a limited antlerless‑harvest strategy; staff will follow up on Act 181 mapping questions.
Get email alerts on the Wildlife Food Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioner Jason Batchelder told the House Committee on Agriculture, Food Resiliency, & Forestry on Jan. 17 that Vermont Fish & Wildlife’s regulated hunting, fishing and outreach programs provide a measurable contribution to food security and informal food distribution across the state.
"We're here to talk today a little bit about cost avoidance and food security that we feel is provided by the department," Batchelder said, opening a presentation titled "Nutritional Significance of Wildlife Conservation of Vermont." He emphasized the department’s constitutional mandate, citing "Article 2, chapter 67" to frame wildlife as a public trust.
Batchelder and staff presented participation and harvest figures they said support that claim. He cited roughly 1 in 6 Vermonters holding a hunting or fishing license and gave specific figures for harvest and stocking: the department supplies about 190,000 pounds of trout, salmon and walleye annually through stocking; the agency reported 54 moose harvested in 2024 (about 300 pounds each on average), roughly 800,000 pounds of venison-equivalent from deer harvests, and 908 bears taken in 2024 (about 45,000 pounds).
A staff member described a conservative $6,000,000 "cost-avoidance" estimate based on ground‑beef price averages and noted the figure excludes fish and small-game harvests. "If you include those, those multipliers of the $6,000,000 by 3 or 4 — it's really like a $20,000,000 value," the staff member said, qualifying the department’s headline number as conservative.
Batchelder outlined programs that move harvested meat to food shelves and communities. He described a warden-led effort called "Robenison for Vermonters," led by senior warden Abigail Sarah, which processes mostly roadkill venison and distributes roughly 1,000 pounds annually to food shelves. The department also runs fish-processing clinics and community fishing events to train people in field-to-table skills.
On licensing and regulation, Batchelder listed fees and access rules: annual hunting and fishing licenses are $28 each; a combination license equates to about 13 cents per day in his breakdown. He said Vermont is "the only state that allows the sale of venison," adding that sales are permitted "within 20 days of the close of the season." He identified USDA inspection as the primary barrier to broader commercial processing and distribution of wild game products.
Committee members raised related policy questions. Representative O'Brien asked whether venison sold at retail must go through USDA or Vermont Agriculture inspection; Batchelder said USDA requirements often limit commercial markets and confirmed that "Tennyson for Vermonters" (the department program referenced) does not require USDA inspection. Representative Boston suggested the state consider certification for wild mushroom sellers; Batchelder acknowledged Vermont currently lacks a certification policy for foragers selling mushrooms.
On population and habitat management, Batchelder described recent regulatory steps to reduce overbrowsing and encourage forest regeneration. He said the department has expanded archery zones in several municipalities (including Montpelier, Burlington and South Burlington), moved some archery seasons earlier (starting Sept. 15), and is offering a second‑buck tag this year. To address high female-driven population imbalances, the department is piloting limited permits that allow high‑powered rifles for antlerless (doe) harvest in targeted situations, with magazine‑capacity limits and other restrictions; Batchelder said the approach is intended to reduce browse pressure and support forest succession.
Members also asked about Act 181 conservation mapping (tier 3 habitat connectors). Batchelder deferred detailed mapping questions to the wildlife director and offered to have department staff follow up with committee members.
The department emphasized education and access programs — hunter education, "Let's Go Fishing," and stocking near access areas — as part of a broader strategy to maintain both hunting/fishing opportunity and habitat. Batchelder said many initiatives aim to sustain affordable access to protein sourced from Vermont lands and waters while balancing conservation objectives.
The committee did not take formal action in the session. Batchelder offered to provide follow-up materials and to connect the committee with division staff for technical questions, including Act 181 mapping and the department’s harvest and economic estimates.

