Residents press commission on YMCA closure and Community House sale as legal fight continues
Loading...
Summary
Public commenters urged the city to preserve the YMCA's aquatic and fitness services and to prevent loss of the Birmingham Community House; the city outlined ongoing litigation over the Community House sale and said the court denied an expedited motion and sanctioned the community house for procedural failures.
Dozens of residents used the public comment period to press the commission on two connected topics: the impending closure of YMCA operations in Birmingham and the proposed sale of the Birmingham Community House.
David Bloom and other residents urged the city to explore options to keep the pool and fitness services operating, including auditing a potential buyer's books and considering whether the city could operate the pool at cost. Linda Solomon and members of a self‑described Visionary Arts Council urged that the community house remain available for classes, events and life‑cycle services. Paul Reagan urged the city to "Make an offer. Make them an offer to purchase the land," saying it would preserve services and goodwill.
Mayor Clinton Balor provided a staff summary. He said the YMCA sold its building to the city several years ago when it faced insolvency and had since indicated it would cease operations in Birmingham in April. The city said renovations and funding to house Next (a senior organization) on the first floor were approved by voters, but that the city explicitly had no interest in owning and operating the pool because of the high costs of operation, maintenance and staffing.
On the legal dispute over the Community House, Mayor Balor said the city's request for a temporary restraining order remains outstanding and that the community house's request for an expedited hearing on its motion for summary disposition was denied. "Furthermore, [the judge] sanctioned the community house and ordered it to pay the city's reasonable costs ... because of procedural failures by the community house attorneys," the mayor said. The city stated its legal contention that the community house "abandoned the charitable purposes for which it was formed," and that deed restrictions and trust provisions could require conveyance to another nonprofit rather than sale proceeds being used to form a foundation.
Speakers from the public urged stronger preservation actions and criticized the commission's decision to delay action on the historic preservation plan (see separate coverage); others warned about security and community access if particular buyers occupy community facilities. The litigation remains active and the judge's timetable for hearing summary disposition arguments is likely months away.
Next steps: The city said it remains interested in touring the Community House and assessing maintenance costs and will continue to monitor the court schedule; residents urged additional outreach and consideration of purchase or operating partnerships.
