Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rules Of Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ethics committee adopts updated rules of procedure, agrees to rework complaints statute
Summary
The committee approved a package of revisions to its rules of procedure, codifying definitions (including interns as legislative employees), interim-administrator steps, confidentiality and advisory-opinion procedures, and directed staff to work with legislative counsel to reformat and redraft complaint statutes for clarity and compliance with drafting standards.
The Alaska Legislative Ethics Committee approved a set of revisions to its rules of procedure during its Nov. 21 full committee meeting and agreed to pursue a separate follow-up to convert a working draft of statutory changes into standard legislative drafting format.
Chair Joyce Anderson said the subcommittee's work clarified the committee's scope and operations, including adding an explicit definition of "legislative employee" to include interns and staff, codifying procedures for appointing an acting interim administrator if a vacancy occurs, specifying confidentiality and distribution practices for confidential materials, and refining the process and timelines for advisory opinions (including a 60-day response period that restarts when additional information is received).
Members discussed several substantive statutory issues in the draft work product. The committee debated whether the Ethics Committee should be added to a statutory exemption to allow issuance of subpoenas without the speaker/president concurrence; whether public members and committee employees should be excluded from ombudsman jurisdiction (a change tied to a prior ombudsman complaint); and whether the statute's current language on mass mailings and the 60-day campaign window should be clarified to explicitly address email and other digital communications. Committee members asked staff to remove the mass-mailing language from the draft pending further study and to rework the proposed statute text into the standard drafting format used by legislative drafting staff.
A detailed section addressed legal-opinion requests and outside counsel use: the committee agreed that when the administrator requests an outside legal opinion the appropriate committee chair must be notified and must approve the request to limit uncoordinated outside-counsel spending. The rules now state that draft legal opinions are confidential, and any waiver of confidentiality must be made on the public record with explanation.
After discussion, the committee voted to adopt the recommended rules-of-procedure revisions (as edited during the meeting). Chair Anderson asked staff to update the committee's materials and to work with Legislative Affairs counsel (including Dan Wayne and Louis Flora) to convert the working draft statutes into properly formatted legislative draft language ahead of the next session.
Votes at a glance: Committee approved the rules revisions in the Nov. 21 meeting by voice vote (no opposition recorded during the meeting); staff will publish updated rules and circulate a draft of statutory reformatting for the next meeting.
What happens next: Staff will coordinate with Dan Wayne and legislative drafting staff to produce a standard-format work draft for review; the committee scheduled follow-up meetings (teleconference) to finalize statutory language and to publicize any changes to disclosure or mass-mailing rules in the committee newsletter.
