Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics Commission Reappointment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee gives favorable recommendation for Simone Cantorero as alternate on Political Subdivisions Ethics Review Commission
Summary
Simone Cantorero, a lawyer and adjunct BYU professor, told the confirmation committee the commission's role is narrow and statutory; the committee unanimously recommended his reappointment after he described the complaint intake and transparency rules.
Simone Cantorero, nominated for reappointment as an alternate member of the Political Subdivisions Ethics Review Commission, received a unanimous favorable recommendation from the Senate Political Subdivisions Confirmation Committee after explaining his legal background and how the commission evaluates complaints.
Cantorero told the committee he moved to Utah in 2001 for law school, has practiced civil and commercial law, worked as a corporate lawyer and now serves as chief legal officer for a Salt Lake City–based company that provides emergency call-taking protocols and quality review services (company name not specified). He described prior public service, including appointment by the Utah Supreme Court to its committee on the rules of professional conduct, where he served more than 12 years, and work as an adjunct law professor at Brigham Young University.
Describing the commission’s duties, Cantorero said the panel’s role "is defined by the legislature in statute, making it necessary to do legal analysis by applying the facts and the evidence as they are alleged and presented to the law as it is written." He told the committee that the statutory process includes an initial determination to assess whether complaints are substantiated by supporting information—documents, witnesses, or other evidence—before proceeding to a public hearing.
Senator Musselman asked how the commission balances openness with confidentiality during intake. Cantorero said the intake and initial review are designed to filter unsupported opinions from substantiated allegations; he said initial meetings are confidential and a public hearing follows only when the commission finds a violation. Paul Warner, who spoke during public comment in support, echoed that the commission’s first meeting on a complaint is "totally confidential" and that public hearings follow substantiation.
Senator Sandle moved the committee’s favorable recommendation. The committee approved the motion by voice vote and the nomination will be forwarded to the full Senate for consideration.
