Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Certificate Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Historic Resources Board debates imagery on new Salinas certificate of appreciation; staff to refine options
Summary
Members of the Salinas Historic Resources Board reviewed a redesigned Certificate of Appreciation, debating agricultural imagery and the city flower versus built-environment images. Staff will return with alternative mock-ups and finalize guidelines for City Council approval ahead of National Historic Resources Month in May.
The Salinas Historic Resources Board spent part of its December meeting reviewing a redesigned Certificate of Appreciation intended to recognize preservation efforts. Staff presented a new layout that incorporates a vintage Main Street photo, a chrysanthemum (the city flower) medallion and imagery evoking agricultural labor.
No formal action was taken; the board provided feedback and directed staff to return in January with alternate mock-ups that emphasize historic built-environment images if possible. Grant Leonard, planning manager, said the program materials and guidelines will be packaged for City Council approval and that the certificate and application process are intended to be issued in May as part of National Historic Resources Month.
Why it matters: the certificate will be an official recognition the HRB and city use to acknowledge individuals, organizations and projects that contribute to preservation. Board members debated whether the imagery should emphasize Salinas'9 agricultural heritage or focus more directly on historic architecture and built resources—the latter aligns more directly with the board'9s review responsibilities for historic structures.
Discussion highlights - Design elements: Staff presented options that include the Salinas flower (chrysanthemum), bracero/field imagery and a ghosted historic photo of Main Street. Some members favored retaining agricultural and flower symbols as uniquely Salinas; others recommended replacing round medallion images with built-environment illustrations of historic structures. - Board response: One board member commended staff for their responsiveness in refining the design over several months. Another said, "I like the certificate that has several people have spent a lot of time, all of us, in collaboratively getting to this end result," (board member comment recorded in the meeting). Staff and board members agreed the current draft is attractive but that alternatives emphasizing architecture should be prepared. - Process and timing: Staff said the guidelines do not require immediate council approval to continue design work, but that the program and application materials will go to City Council for program approval; the board would collect applications in the spring and present awards in May. - Next steps and volunteers: Board member Michael offered to work with staff to locate archival photographs and images from the city archive to support an architectural-themed design. Staff agreed to produce one or more alternate mock-ups and to bring guidelines back to the board at the next meeting in January.
Other points Board members also discussed the types of recipients the certificate would cover (structures, programs and individuals) and whether the imagery should more narrowly reflect the HRB'9s mission to preserve built historic resources. Staff said the program can be refined and is not final; the board agreed it could adopt the current draft for use while continuing to explore alternatives.
Ending Staff will return with alternative certificate mock-ups (including built-environment options), finalized guidelines and application materials at the January meeting. The board directed staff to package materials for council approval in advance of May, when the city intends to accept applications and present awards.
