Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Civic Symbolism topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee examines standardizing honorary street signs; DPW flags operational costs
Summary
Council staff presented survey results about honorary street sign nominations; members agreed on some principles but not on limits and review bodies. Public Works urged a dedicated budget and noted installation can carry event logistics beyond sign fabrication.
Will Perkins, senior legislative services manager, presented the results of a council staff survey about honorary street signs to the Governmental Operations Standing Committee on Jan. 13. The survey of eight members found broad agreement on several principles but not on precise limits or which outside body should review nominations before council consideration.
Perkins summarized that a majority of respondents favored an outside body reviewing nominations and recommended that street signs honor individual people rather than institutions. Most respondents supported allowing nominations for living people and an expectation of Richmond residency. There was no consensus on a per‑member annual nomination cap or on the frequency council should consider sign nominations.
Bobby Vincent, director of Public Works, told the committee that the manufacture of an honorary sign is relatively inexpensive but that installation and associated on‑site ceremonies impose staff time and event coordination burdens on Public Works. Vincent said the department does roughly the same fabrication work it does for street name signs but that ceremonial installs frequently require scheduling outside regular duties, coordinating crews and managing public events.
Perkins said staff believes that costs should be budgeted to the Department of Public Works (DPW) and suggested moving a rules amendment or ordinance to finalize process, eligibility, limits and frequency. The committee discussed options including per‑district or per‑member limits, use of mid‑block plaques as an alternative, and requiring a separate budget line for honorary signs; committee members asked staff to draft a formal proposal to circulate for review.
Perkins noted a DPW estimate of roughly $700 per sign for production and installation. The committee asked staff and DPW to work offline to prepare language that clarifies roles for council members, DPW, and the mayor’s office and to return with a draft amendment to council rules or an ordinance.
