Harrisville council sworn in, approves routine items and hears a high‑cost city office/public safety building update
Loading...
Summary
Council swore in the mayor and several council members, ratified appointments and approved the 2026 meeting schedule; members also reviewed construction and bond exposure for a proposed new city office/public safety building and discussed costs to cancel or continue the project.
HARRISVILLE — The Harrisville City Council held its regular meeting Tuesday following an open‑house session, administering oaths of office, approving routine consent items and receiving an update on the city office/public safety building.
Roger Schuman was sworn in as mayor and several council members took oaths of office in a public ceremony before the council portion of the meeting. The council approved consent agenda items including minutes for Dec. 9 and Dec. 17 (with small corrections) and ratified mayoral appointments including naming Jason Hadley mayor pro tem and confirming mayoral board assignments for regional water and sewer districts; votes on those consent and appointment motions passed by voice vote.
Council also approved the 2026 meeting schedule as presented (regular council meetings on the second Tuesday of each month) and heard brief youth council presentations on recent community events.
A substantial discussion focused on the proposed new city office/public safety building. The mayor and staff reported financial exposure if the project were canceled: a remaining bond payoff figure cited at roughly $3.0 million, contractor termination exposure (presenter estimate ~ $2.3 million) and architect fees that would remain, plus possible grant repayments (a $2 million grant would need to be repaid if the project were not completed). Staff reported the full project budget at approximately $10.5 million and indicated sales‑tax and impact‑fee revenue streams were the intended funding sources. The council requested additional detail and expressed concern about sunk costs versus long‑term benefits.
Toward the meeting's end, the council moved to enter a closed executive session under UCA 52‑4‑205(1)(c) to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; the motion carried on roll call and the meeting proceeded into the closed session.
