Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council annexes and rezones 27.2-acre Messick Dangler property amid neighbor noise concerns; rezoning passes 6–1
Summary
Council accepted the annexation and rezoned the Messick Dangler property at 37830 Road to P2 (Public/Civic/Institutional Campus). The annexation passed 7–0; rezoning passed 6–1 after neighbors raised noise and enforcement concerns and the applicant said past violations have been corrected.
Get email alerts on the Annexation Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Grand Junction City Council on Wednesday accepted a petition to annex roughly 27.2 acres at 37830 Road and adopted ordinances annexing the land and rezoning it to P2 (Public, Civic and Institutional Campus).
Jessica Johnson, zoning supervisor, presented staff findings that the annexation meets statutory criteria under CRS 31-12-104 (contiguity, community of interest, and petition signatures) and that rezoning to P2 is consistent with the comprehensive plan and implements the residential medium land-use designation. Staff recommended approval, stating "the request has met the burden of proof" under the zoning code.
During the public hearing, nearby resident William Wenger urged the council to account for noise from celebratory events at a wedding-venue use already operating at the site, saying past activities generated live music and late-night disturbance and that county enforcement had issued a notice of violation. In rebuttal, Kim Kirkland, representing the owners, acknowledged the family previously lacked a conditional use permit and said operations have been adjusted: no fireworks now, awareness of noise curfews, and steps taken to reduce neighborhood intrusion.
Council discussion repeatedly emphasized that annexation and rezoning are quasi-judicial and limited to code criteria; members said noise enforcement is handled under city ordinances and enforcement channels rather than as a basis to deny annexation when the application meets statutory criteria.
Council Member Stout moved to accept the annexation petition; after a voice vote the resolution passed 7–0. Ordinance No. 52-91 annexing the territory passed on roll call 7–0. The rezoning ordinance (No. 52-92) passed on final passage with a 6–1 roll call; Council Member Ballard voted no.
Why it matters: annexation and rezoning will bring the property under city land-use jurisdiction, permit review for venue operations, and make city code enforcement the path for any future noise issues. Neighbors voiced concern about operational history; the applicant asserted corrective steps have been taken.
Next steps: annexation and zoning ordinances are final; any enforcement of noise or permit conditions will proceed under applicable city ordinances and code enforcement channels.
