Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board delays comprehensive‑plan text changes after staff explain statutory density implications
Summary
Officials presented minor text amendments to bring the comprehensive plan into compliance with ARS 11‑8‑04(e); staff said some land‑use categories could confer higher residential density on private and state trust lands, and supervisors asked for more background and maps. The board continued the hearings to November dates.
Yavapai County Planning Manager Matt Blake told the Board of Supervisors on Oct. 1 that proposed minor text amendments are intended to incorporate statutory language from ARS 11‑8‑04(e) into the county comprehensive plan — a change that can alter residential density for private and state trust lands placed in certain land‑use categories.
Blake said the county’s 2023 comprehensive plan introduced agricultural and agricultural‑hospitality land‑use categories that, under the statute, could confer an equivalent residential density of one dwelling per acre for affected private or state lands where the underlying zoning allowed lower density (for example, replacing a 1 unit per 2 acre RCU‑2 baseline with 1 unit per acre). "Essentially, ... the statute is saying the county is obligated to incorporate this subsection into the comprehensive plan," Blake said, explaining that the change is required by state law.
Supervisors expressed surprise at the map choices that placed certain private and state lands into those categories, raised concerns about unintended density increases and asked for more documentation and staff meetings with individual supervisors. Several board members said they preferred to review presentation materials and maps before acting. The board voted to continue hearing item 1 to Nov. 5, 2025 and hearing item 2 (procedural Section 10 changes) to Nov. 19, 2025 so staff can provide additional context and revised language.
Blake said the amendments themselves would not immediately change zoning, but they could affect rezoning consistency requirements and create additional questions for the forthcoming zoning code update. The board directed staff to provide maps and background and to meet with supervisors individually before the next hearing.
