Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenter says Meriden has many unaddressed code violations; planning staff cites informal resolutions and limited enforcement capacity
Summary
Dan Sabroski told the committee he has documented numerous visible zoning and property violations and urged more active enforcement and redevelopment; planning staff responded that formal counts exclude informal resolutions and that enforcement is limited by a single part‑time officer.
During the public‑comment period, Dan Sabroski urged the Housing and Zoning Committee to address what he described as widespread and visible zoning and property violations across Meriden.
"These violations ... they're really not being addressed," Sabroski said, offering examples including blocked storefront windows downtown, a camper parked on Hanover near the cemetery, and vacant lots that remain unused. He suggested the city consider selling lots for a nominal fee ("Give us a dollar") to encourage redevelopment and increase the tax base.
Sabroski also raised a recent Inland Wetlands issue on Baldwin where he said a lot was clear‑cut and that the developer was being held up; he questioned interagency coordination and urged economic development staff to attend planning meetings.
Planning staff responded during the staff report that the formal count of zoning violations (six since Aug. 19) includes only cases where an official order has been issued, and that many issues are first handled informally without an order. Staff cited limited enforcement capacity — a single enforcement officer who also processes planning applications and is not full time — as a factor affecting formal enforcement counts.
The committee noted the discrepancy between visible violations recounted by members of the public and the city's formal enforcement statistics and asked staff to provide more comparative data and results from the Oct. 3 code walk.
No formal action was taken during public comment; the committee moved on to staff reports afterward.
