Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Meeting And Data Practices topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lake Elmo city attorney leads training on open‑meeting, data‑practice and conflict rules for commissioners
Summary
City Attorney Sarah Sincalas briefed commissioners and council members on Open Meeting Law changes (remote attendance rules), data practices (records retention on personal devices), gift limits and conflict-of-interest rules for quasi‑judicial land‑use decisions.
Sarah Sincalas, Lake Elmo’s city attorney, gave an extended training to the council and appointed commissioners covering Open Meeting Law, data practices, the gift law, conflicts of interest, meeting procedures and social-media guidance.
On the Open Meeting Law, Sincalas emphasized notice requirements and recent statutory changes that make remote participation easier by removing the prior location‑disclosure requirement. "We have to notice the meeting 3 days ahead of time," she said, and noted that remote participants who meet visibility and audio requirements count toward quorum.
She warned that serial communications by a quorum across email, text or social-media threads can constitute an unlawful meeting and explained penalties for intentional Open Meeting Law violations (including a personal fine and potential forfeiture for separate violations). Sincalas also reviewed data-practices rules: communications about city business—even on personal devices or private email—can be government data subject to production and retention rules.
The training covered the $5 threshold in the gift law and advised officials to disclose and, if necessary, decline gifts from 'interested persons.' On conflicts of interest and quasi‑judicial hearings, she urged commissioners to disclose potential financial interests before meetings and avoid advocacy that could create a due‑process problem in land‑use cases.
Sincalas closed with practical advice: use city staff for procedural questions, keep separate records for city business, and contact the city attorney with pre‑meeting questions rather than handling potential conflict or data-practice issues at the dais. The session opened for questions and will inform future commission procedures.
