Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Affordable Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Erie council votes to repeal alternative-standards provision in affordable housing code after heated public hearing
Summary
After a lengthy public hearing and council debate, Erie's Town Council voted to adopt Ordinance 23-20-25, repealing portions of Ordinance O17-2023 that allowed administrative approval and alternative development standards for certain affordable-housing projects; council directed staff and the planning commission to collaborate on compliant replacements and study sessions.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Affordable Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Erie's Town Council voted on Aug. 12 to adopt Ordinance 23-20-25, which repeals portions of Ordinance O17-2023 that established alternative standards and an administrative approval pathway for affordable housing projects in the town's Unified Development Code (UDC). The vote followed an extended public hearing, multiple public speakers and significant council deliberation over compliance with Colorado's Proposition 1-23 (fast-track/affordable housing provisions) and local process concerns.
Planning and development director Sarah Narmela and staffer Kelly reviewed the ordinance history: a 2023 housing needs assessment and a July 2023 UDC amendment that created alternative standards and an expedited administrative review. Planning commission review in 2025 resulted in a July 2 recommendation to retain the ordinance but limit the administrative approval process to projects of 100 units or fewer with at least 12% affordable units, and to work with council on UDC revisions.
Public comment at the hearing cut both ways. Ben Hemphill (planning commission chair, speaking as a resident) and Bob Broadus (vice chair, Planning Commission) urged council not to repeal the ordinance outright and instead to accept the commission's recommendation and pursue joint revisions. Bob Broadus emphasized commission willingness to collaborate. Other speakers, including Cliff Swart, argued the existing ordinance was premature and defective, inconsistent with Proposition 1-23, and short on required public oversight and community engagement; Swart urged full repeal so staff and council could draft a new, compliant ordinance.
Council deliberations focused on several specific concerns staff and commissioners had already identified: the administrative review pathway can limit public engagement and planning commission oversight; O17-2023's 25% density bonus (on top of recent comp-plan density changes) was criticized as arbitrary by some; the affordable unit percentage and AMI thresholds in the ordinance differ from Proposition 1-23 expectations; and the need to balance faster approvals with community notice and input. Multiple council members urged joint study sessions with the planning commission and additional public outreach, including review of the town survey results.
After debate the council considered the staff-recommended Ordinance 23-20-25 to repeal the alternative-standards/administrative-approval provisions. The motion passed on a roll-call vote; the clerk recorded individual yes/no votes on the record and declared the motion passed. Council members directed staff and the planning commission to collaborate on UDC amendments that conform to state requirements and to return with a replacement process; staff also will prepare materials for upcoming study sessions and consent-agenda review so council comments can be consolidated before statutory deadlines related to state programs.
The repeal does not abolish local affordable-housing goals; several council members and staff emphasized a continuing commitment to incentivizing income-appropriate housing while reshaping the town's fast-track and review processes.
