Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Regional Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Keizer council authorizes staff to submit Salem‑Keizer regional scenario plan to state, 6–1
Summary
The Keizer City Council voted 6–1 on Jan. 20 to authorize staff to submit the Salem‑Keizer Regional Scenario Plan to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development as required under the state's Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities (CFEC) rules; staff described the plan as aspirational and not fiscally constrained.
The Keizer City Council voted 6–1 on Jan. 20 to authorize staff to submit the Salem‑Keizer Regional Scenario Plan to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) under the state's Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities rules. Council President Starr moved the authorization; Councilor Christopher cast the lone no vote.
The plan is intended as a regional, aspirational framework to help local jurisdictions align land use and transportation choices with state greenhouse‑gas reduction goals. Planning staff described the document as a high‑level, visioning tool that "is not fiscally constrained" and said it will inform forthcoming updates to the city’s Transportation System Plan (TSP).
Supporters on the council said submission is required by state rules and that filing the regional plan preserves Keizer’s ability to move forward with local transportation planning and grant eligibility. Planning staff noted the plan incorporates measures already identified in local TSPs and in the regional RTSP and emphasized it does not itself obligate immediate spending decisions.
Dissenting councilors questioned several assumptions in the regional scenarios, including projections tied to lane‑mile additions and broader regional measures. Councilor Kohler characterized parts of the plan as more “aspirational” than actionable; staff replied the lane‑mile metrics reflect elements in adopted regional plans and that the state review process (DLCD) will accept or request revisions.
Councilors also asked about the consequences of refusing to submit. Staff said non‑submission could trigger a compliance hearing before the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) and might jeopardize future TSP funding because the CFEC rules tie regional scenario planning to the TSP update process.
The motion passed with a 6–1 tally; Councilor Christopher recorded the only vote against the authorization. The council’s authorization directs staff to submit the same regional package concurrently with partner jurisdictions in the region.
