Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the ADU Amendments topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee advances ADU code changes to allow non-owner-occupied units, alter parking rules

City of Cheyenne Public Service Committee · January 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee recommended approval on second reading of changes to accessory dwelling unit rules that remove the owner-occupancy requirement and relax parking-location rules; planning staff said building- and fire-code standards would apply and several council members requested further clarity on building-code enforcement.

The committee recommended approval on second reading of an amendment to the Unified Development Code that removes the owner-occupancy requirement for accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and adjusts parking rules.

Planning staffer Seth Lloyd told the committee the change would eliminate the owner-occupancy requirement and redefine parking so that required spaces could be anywhere on the property (for example, a three-car driveway), giving more flexibility. Lloyd said that removing owner-occupancy will make many ADUs functionally equivalent to flat-over-flat duplexes and therefore subject to building- and fire-code standards for duplexes.

Council members raised safety and enforcement questions. One member asked whether basement ADUs would be required to meet egress-window standards; Lloyd said building code typically requires egress for sleeping areas in new construction, though existing-buildings rules can be more flexible and specific questions should be addressed to the building official. Councilwoman Rennie said she would vote no at this time because she had unanswered questions for the building department.

Habitat for Humanity of Laramie County’s executive director, Dan Doris, told the committee he supported the amendment as a way to add housing units in the community.

The committee voted to recommend approval on second reading; the recommendation will proceed to the full council. Staff and the planning commission had recommended approval and attached letters of support.