Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Road Equipment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Road superintendent flags failing grader motor; commissioners weigh repair vs. replacement
Summary
Road staff told the board a graders motor has sustained low compression and repeated exhaust/regeneration problems; a vendor quote and rebuild estimates put motor-and-labor near $51,000—$65,000, and staff recommended replacing the motor rather than repeated repairs.
Get email alerts on the Road Equipment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Road department staff reported Jan. 20 that one of the countys graders has a chronic engine-compression problem that causes frequent servicing and exhaust/regeneration issues. Staff said past rebuilds and parts have produced recurring failures and that vendor quotes for a remanufactured long-block motor plus associated parts and labor put the cost in the $51,000 to $65,000 range depending on options and warranty.
Road staff recommended installing a new long-block motor or replacing the grader rather than continuing short-term repairs. Commissioners discussed trade-in options, warranty considerations (a dealer-backed reman with a one-year warranty and option to extend), and the risk of buying a motor from an unknown rebuild shop out of state.
Finance context: the board was told the road equipment/repair-parts budget has about $102,004.41 remaining and the road budget is roughly 25%—5% expended with half the fiscal year remaining; commissioners judged there is budget capacity but asked staff to return with firm quotes and a procurement plan.
No formal purchase motion was recorded at the meeting; staff were directed to investigate options and provide formal recommendations at a future session.

