Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Committee Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee issues recommendations on multiple bills: flood planning advanced; several bills found inexpedient to legislate

New Hampshire House Municipal and County Government Committee · January 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its Jan. 20 meeting the New Hampshire Municipal & County Government Committee recommended HB 14-68 (flood resilience planning) as Ought to Pass and recorded committee recommendations on a set of other bills (many ITL). The transcript records roll-call tallies and accepted technical amendments for a dozen bills.

What the committee did: After public hearings the committee met in executive session and took recorded roll-call votes on a sequence of bills heard that day. The transcript records motions, seconders and final roll-call tallies for each matter. Below is a concise, committee-level summary of the formal outcomes and the committee’s action on amendments where applicable.

Votes at a glance (committee recommendation, roll-call tally): - HB 16-90 (impact fees allowing safety equipment): Inexpedient to legislate (ITL). Motion passed 18–0. (exec session motion: Representative Karasinski; roll call recorded). (topicintro SEG 058, topicfinish SEG 561) - HB 14-61 FN Local (encourage sewer extensions): ITL. Motion passed 18–0. (topicintro SEG 563, topicfinish SEG 1073) - HB 13-44 (intermunicipal compacts): ITL. Motion passed 18–0. (topicintro SEG 1086, topicfinish SEG 1493) - HB 14-68 (municipal flood resilience planning): Ought to Pass. Motion passed 18–0; committee accepted replacement language offered by the sponsor. (topicintro SEG 1825, topicfinish SEG 2006) - HB 14-97 (removal/replacement of land-use members): ITL. Motion passed 18–0. (topicintro SEG 2318, topicfinish SEG 2968) - HB 12-46 (planning board members serving on other local boards): Ought to Pass. Motion passed 18–0. (topicintro SEG 2969, topicfinish SEG 3073) - HB 18-02 (training, testing, certification for land-use members): Inexpedient to legislate. Motion passed 18–0. (topicintro SEG 3074, topicfinish SEG 3799) - HB 14-79 FN (repeal motor-vehicle registration permit fees): ITL. Motion passed 18–0. (topicintro SEG 3808, topicfinish SEG 3881) - HB 10-44 (county commissioner vacancies): Ought to Pass with amendment (committee accepted amendment 2026-0069h and then voted OTP as amended). Motion passed 18–0. (exec transcript shows amendment acceptance followed by final vote). (topicintro SEG 4890, topicfinish SEG 5050) - HB 12-96 (elderly tax exemption adjustments): Ought to Pass with amendment (committee accepted amendment 2026-0152h). Motion passed 17–1. (topicintro SEG 5052, topicfinish SEG 5243) - HB 12-78 (majority tax-cap override procedure): ITL. Motion passed 16–2. (topicintro SEG 5249, topicfinish SEG 5363) - HB 13-83 (methods for overriding local tax caps): ITL. Motion passed 10–8. (topicintro SEG 5367, topicfinish SEG 5492) - HB 12-27 (calculation of local tax cap): ITL. Motion passed 11–7. (topicintro SEG 5493, topicfinish SEG 5623)

What this means: "Inexpedient to legislate" (ITL) indicates the committee is not recommending passage to the full House; "Ought to Pass" (OTP) or "Ought to Pass with Amendment" (OTPA) indicates committee support for the bill (or amended bill) to move forward to the House calendar. Several bills were identified as requiring more work or technical fixes before the committee could comfortably recommend passage.

Next steps: Committee reports and the accepted amendment texts will be filed and transmitted to the House calendar as recorded in the transcript. Sponsors were asked to consider technical fixes where the committee raised statutory cross-reference concerns.