Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates inventory of closed/open landfills as a way to expand disposal options
Summary
A bill to inventory brownfields and closed/open landfill sites drew support as a low-cost 'paper survey' to test claims that only one suitable site exists; members discussed narrowing scope and adjusting a large fiscal note tied to site investigations.
Legislators debated a bill aimed at developing an inventory of potential disposal or redevelopable sites to determine whether other locations could be appropriate for solid-waste disposal or landfill siting.
Representative Haskins said the bill was intended as a simple inventory and screening exercise to test assertions that a single site (Dalton) was the only feasible option for a new landfill. “It's not a brownfield bill, but other open and closed landfill areas so that we could determine whether or not the statement… there was no place else but Dalton to put a new landfill,” Haskins said.
Committee members, DES staff and others pressed for a narrower, lower-cost approach focused on publicly available records and screening criteria (e.g., distance to schools or airports, presence of municipal water) rather than expensive core sampling and hydrogeologic analyses. The department's fiscal note—based on in-depth site studies—was described as large (tens of millions), and members discussed drafting amendments that would limit the work to a paper survey and adjust the fiscal note accordingly.
The committee agreed to send the bill to a solid-waste subcommittee for amendment work to develop screening criteria and a more cost-conscious approach.
