Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environmental Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee asks for amendments on bill to require baseline environmental studies for some facilities
Summary
Lawmakers agreed the idea of a pre-development baseline environmental-impact study is sound but objected to using a single size threshold; members proposed a subcommittee to craft a narrower, use- and materials-focused amendment.
A bill requiring a baseline environmental-impact study for certain manufacturing and storage facilities drew committee consensus on the concept, but lawmakers said the draft needs refining.
Representative Peter Bixby told the Environment and Agriculture Committee that a baseline study makes sense but that delimiting the requirement by square footage alone will miss key risk drivers. “Delimiting it by size doesn’t get at what the potential dangers are,” he said, urging an amendment that targets high-risk materials and processes instead of a simple acreage or square-foot cutoff.
Members proposed sending HP 16 21 to a subcommittee and drafting language for a focused screening approach that could include materials handled, chemical inventories and transport considerations rather than a single size metric. Representative Kantawa and Representative Germanna volunteered to work on targeted amendments to bring back a narrower proposal.
