Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Natural Resources Overlay topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Town planners unveil tiered Natural Resource Overlay map; residents ask about impacts on small lots
Summary
Planning staff presented a tiered NRO map (base/mid/high) and corresponding land-development regulation updates; public commenters urged careful analysis of impacts on small, deed-restricted lots and asked staff to prioritize flexibility and exemptions for small-home improvements.
Get email alerts on the Natural Resources Overlay topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning staff and a consultant presented a multi-year effort to update the town's Natural Resource Overlay (NRO) on Nov. 17, describing a three-tier map (base, mid and high) and proposing tailored land-development processes by tier to protect habitat and water resources while limiting burdens on small in-town lots.
Ryan Hostetter, planning staff, described the mapping process as built from focal-species habitat layers and water/wetland data that informed base, mid and high tiers. Megan Smith of EcoConnect, who helped update the county map the town is following, told the council the methodology remains scientifically valid and that adopting the updated map and LDRs will improve town guidance compared with the 1994 NRO.
"The biology is still good information," Hostetter said, noting the county adopted a version and the town's draft will be tailored to the town's smaller-lot context. Smith added that while methods can be refined, the underlying habitat layers provide useful guidance for policy and that staff will update mapping layers as new vegetation data becomes available.
Staff proposed no added process for projects in the base tier, a possible checklist for mid-tier projects (with exemptions for small projects and affordable housing), and maintaining an environmental analysis process in the high tier similar to the current NRO. Councilors and residents raised concerns about small-lot buildability, whether a 100-foot creek setback would render lots unbuildable and how the map treats adjacent lots with different tiers.
Public comment emphasized care for small property owners. Amberley Baker, an East Jackson resident, said her 0.31-acre lot sits in a tiny high-tier pocket and asked staff to analyze whether regulations would make routine improvements like a one-car garage infeasible or cost-prohibitive.
Staff said it will produce draft LDR language this winter and seek public review and planning commission hearings in the coming months, and that further GIS work will help evaluate setbacks and exemption thresholds before final recommendations.
