Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Airport topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council OKs $500,000 amendment to airport terminal design contract, raising design cap to $20 million

Redmond City Council · January 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Redmond City Council approved a $500,000 task order to add design work for the airport terminal, increasing the contract cap from $19.5 million to $20 million so staff can prepare costed options for future council decisions.

The Redmond City Council voted to approve a $500,000 amendment to contract 2022-33 for architectural and engineering services related to the Redmond Airport terminal, increasing the contract's not-to-exceed amount from $19,500,000 to $20,000,000.

Zach Bass, Redmond Airport director, told the council the contract has had three prior task orders and that a fourth task order would allow staff to design potential options — for example, reconfiguring pre-security retail, preparing a terminal criteria manual, and redesigning problematic entry vestibules — so the city can present priced alternatives if contingency funds become available. "What we're asking is for the fourth task order ... which would add $500,000 not to exceed, bringing the total for the design up to $20,000,000," Bass said.

Bass said some items under consideration would require structural redesign of the building, which drives cost. Council members asked whether the design work depends on future contingency funds; Bass said the amendment is meant to let staff "get ahead" so the city can return with firm cost estimates and options for later council approval. A motion to approve the amendment was made, seconded and adopted by voice vote.

The amendment funds design work only; Bass emphasized any construction or scope expansion would require subsequent council approval and separate funding decisions.