A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Experts tell bonding committee Mass Ready's water funding helps but may be insufficient for PFAS and large drinking‑water needs

January 13, 2026 | 2026 Legislature MA, Massachusetts


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Experts tell bonding committee Mass Ready's water funding helps but may be insufficient for PFAS and large drinking‑water needs
The committee heard focused testimony on drinking‑water, wastewater and PFAS needs in Massachusetts alongside discussion of how S.2542's proposed $385 million and $120 million line items would be used.

"This is for drinking water and wastewater upgrades," Secretary Rebecca Tepper said of the $385 million line, explaining the appropriation would supplement the state's Clean Water Trust state revolving fund and include low‑ and no‑interest loans and grant support for affordability. DEP staff added that roughly $250 million was described in committee discussion as new authorization to support the SRF program and that federal SRF funding has been historically important but appears less certain going forward.

Jennifer Peterson, executive director of the Massachusetts Water Works Association, warned that state needs far exceed those figures, citing a U.S. EPA estimate that Massachusetts will need roughly $37 billion in drinking‑water and clean‑water investments over 20 years. She said the bill's PFAS allocation will help private‑well cleanup and smaller sites but is unlikely to cover the full cost for larger municipal systems facing new PFAS standards.

DEP testified that some PFAS projects have experienced cost overruns tied to supply‑chain delays and complexity, and that the bill's state funding can backfill projects to completion when federal support declines. Officials emphasized affordability screening to direct low‑interest SRF loans and grants to communities with fiscal constraints.

What was requested: Water systems and utilities asked the committee to consider recurring, predictable funding and expanded grant eligibility for core utility upgrades, redundancy projects, and school and childcare filtration where contamination is found. Suppliers and manufacturers also urged earmarks for point‑of‑use filtration in schools and childcare centers to reduce exposures quickly while lead service line replacements and large PFAS remediation projects proceed.

Next steps: Officials said additional technical details on SRF capitalization, project prioritization and eligibility will be provided to the committee as the bill is amended.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Massachusetts articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI