CTE and Fast Track apprenticeship programs cited as tools to bring industry experts into classrooms
Loading...
Summary
Officials from the Office of College and Career Readiness and University of Central Missouri told lawmakers that CTE teacher roles are hard to fill because private-sector wages and tuition for pedagogy courses discourage industry experts; Fast Track apprenticeship and grant limits were discussed as partial solutions.
State and university officials told the House committee that career and technical education (CTE) teacher positions are especially difficult to staff because candidates often face a pay cut and must pay tuition for essential pedagogy coursework.
Travis Plume, assistant commissioner for the Office of College and Career Readiness, said CTE roles often draw from high-paying private-sector occupations and that required pedagogy courses can cost around $7,000. "It—s sort of a one-two punch," he said, describing the combination of foregone private-sector wages and additional tuition as a major barrier to recruiting industry professionals into CTE classrooms.
Dr. Mike Pantleo of the University of Central Missouri described a Fast Track registered-apprenticeship cohort that reduces cost barriers by pairing paid, on-the-job experience with pedagogy coursework. Pantleo said Fast Track has helped many candidates but that the program—s income caps can exclude otherwise qualified participants; presenters said current Fast Track income limits are roughly $40,000 for an individual and $80,000 for joint filers and that a Senate bill has been filed to raise those thresholds (the presenter referenced the bill verbally but the transcript did not record a clear bill number).
Lawmakers asked about the length of programs, whether pedagogy courses can be offered through community colleges, and how districts adjust salary schedules for CTE hires. Officials said pedagogy sequences can vary (some programs count an NTI/new teacher institute toward requirements) and that districts have local control over salary decisions. The presenters advocated a mix of financial incentives (grant eligibility and Fast Track adjustments) and structural support (mentoring and targeted pedagogy) to attract and retain CTE educators.
No committee action was taken; staff follow-up was requested to clarify Fast Track income-limit proposals and program uptake data.
