Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Small Business Signs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill would let small rural businesses place directional signs across two-lane highways; debate centers on inspection fees
Summary
Representative Jim Cabralow said HB 2,145 would permit unzoned rural businesses to place directional signs on land they own across two‑lane highways; members questioned removal of a $200 MoDOT inspection fee and raised safety and liability concerns.
Representative Jim Cabralow presented House Bill 2,145 to permit small businesses in rural areas to place directional signs on privately owned land across from their business when certain conditions (ownership of the business and land, and a permit) are met. Cabralow said the change would help businesses that cannot place signs on the same side of the road due to topography or curves and noted the bill applies to non-freeway primary two‑lane roads.
Members raised questions about language changes and possible conflicts with federal-aid highway rules. Representative Woods and others sought clarification about struck language referencing "federal aid primary systems." Several members focused on a $200 MoDOT inspection fee that some versions of the proposal waive; opponents including Arnie C argued the fee funds inspections that reduce liability risk for large sign structures and should not be removed.
Arnie C testified in opposition, saying he worried about removing the $200 inspection requirement because periodic inspection helps prevent structural failures and unequal treatment of billboard owners. Members discussed possible amendments to retain inspection processes or fees; sponsor indicated willingness to amend to address concerns.
The hearing closed without a recorded committee vote.
