Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents urge council to deny Pebble Creek rezoning, citing open‑space, drainage and traffic concerns

Greenville County Communications, Governmental Affairs & Public Communication Committee · January 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Two public commenters asked Greenville County leaders to reject a rezoning that would replace tennis courts with 24 rental townhomes, arguing the change would reduce open space, add congestion, and be incompatible with an established golf‑course community; one speaker warned of past buyouts after problematic infill.

Multiple Pebble Creek residents used public comment to oppose a proposed rezoning that would allow 24 higher-density rental townhomes on land currently used for tennis courts within the Pebble Creek community.

"The proposal for rezoning of, Pebble Creek Drive is in direct conflict with the value set forth in South Carolina Enabling Act," Matthew Woods said, arguing the tennis courts provide essential open recreational space and that adding 24 rental units would concentrate population, increase congestion and be incompatible with the low-density character of the area. He asked the council to deny the rezoning request.

Gail Crawford, who said she recently moved to Pebble Creek and has experience as a residential builder and developer, reinforced those concerns and cited the "South Carolina Local Government Comprehensive Planning Enabling Act of 1994." She described the area as 3.3 miles of Stallings Road with multiple creeks and swamps, narrow two‑lane roads, and a history—she referenced 'Del Norte'—in which inadequate drainage led to county buyouts and taxpayer costs. Crawford said the original design was for a golf course and warned that infill development could create similar problems.

No formal vote on rezoning was recorded during this public-comment block; the speakers urged council members to uphold planning laws and protect recreational and scenic areas.