Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
School board weighs FY27 capital plan and whether to seek new bond to finish HVAC work
Summary
The Bedford School Board reviewed an $816,000 FY27 capital plan and debated pursuing a new bond (discussed in a $3.7M–$4.2M range) to finish HVAC controls and remaining work left from a previous renovation, citing long lead times and rising costs.
The Bedford School Board spent the bulk of its Nov. 3 budget session reviewing proposed capital expenditures for fiscal year 2026–27 and debating whether to ask voters for a new bond to complete HVAC controls and related unfinished work from an earlier project.
Todd Zollman, the district’s director of maintenance, told the board that the capital expenditure line is driving the maintenance budget increase and outlined a proposed capital plan that included elevator modernization, controls updates, ADA door operators, and replacements for rooftop HVAC units. Zollman said the district’s capital plan for FY27 contains items totaling in the hundreds of thousands of dollars and that many rooftop and controls components are now at or past their expected service life.
"The capital expenditure line is up significantly," Zollman said as he reviewed bid results and refreshed estimates. He told board members the project list includes unfinished work from a previous HVAC bond and that the cost shortfall to finish the package is material. Board members and staff discussed using about $581,000 in interest earned on the bond account as a partial offset but noted using those funds for new work would require a separate warrant.
Several trustees framed a potential new bond as a way to avoid rising prices and repeated short‑term repairs. One member estimated a $4.0M–$4.2M ask could be financed over 20 years at roughly 4 percent, producing an annual tax impact for the district that the board described as manageable if voters approve the warrant. Others urged caution: several said they want precise control specifications and updated cost assessments before committing to a warrant and emphasized the need to work with a controls specialist to narrow disparities found in earlier bids.
The board highlighted several capital priorities in the near term: integration of the McKelvey elevator with the fire alarm system (a modernization package described as safety‑critical), replacement of aging fire panels and paging systems at Riddle Brook (noted as eligible for the state SAFE grant), and selective ADA door operator installations at high‑traffic entrances to improve accessibility. Zollman said the McKelvey elevator dates to the late 1980s and that modernizing the controller and tying the elevator to the fire alarm was an urgent safety measure.
Board members debated whether to phase the remaining work, to place a larger ask on a future warrant, or to continue funding components in the operating budget. Several trustees said they prefer to finalize engineering and bid specs for the controls before placing a warrant on the ballot so voters will see a detailed, bounded proposal.
The board did not take a formal vote on a new bond during the session; members directed staff to refine control specifications and return with more detailed cost estimates and timing before the Dec. 1 budget meeting. Zollman said staff will continue to identify which items could be deferred if the board decides to reduce the FY27 capital ask.
