Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
Senate votes to reject governor’s executive order that moved Cannabis Commission under Department of Commerce
Loading...
Summary
On Jan. 16, 2026, the CNMI Senate voted 6‑yes, 1‑abstention to reject Executive Order 2025‑005, which would have transferred the Cannabis Commission to a division of the Department of Commerce and terminated the commissioners. Senate legal counsel told members the EO may conflict with Public Law 20‑66 and CNMI constitutional provisions and that the EO omitted the cannabis revolving fund balance from its stated financial rationale.
The Northern Mariana Islands Senate voted on Jan. 16, 2026, to reject Governor’s Executive Order 2025‑005, which transferred the Cannabis Commission into the Alcohol, Tobacco and Beverage Control (ABTC) division of the Department of Commerce and terminated the commission’s members. After a motion to disapprove the EO was seconded, the clerk reported the final tally as six votes in favor of rejection, one abstention and two members absent.The motion to disapprove was offered from the floor by the chamber’s floor leader, who told members the motion followed a legal review and recent materials the Senate had received.
Senate legal counsel delivered a detailed opinion to the chamber that raised constitutional and statutory concerns about the EO. Counsel summarized the administration’s stated financial justification — “as of 07/31/2025, the cannabis commission reported a total of fiscal year 2025 year‑to‑date taxes of only $113,880” — but said the governor’s message omitted the cannabis revolving fund balance. Counsel told senators that the acting commissioner’s letter and a Secretary of Finance certification showed approximately $378,342.50 in the cannabis revolving fund, a sum counsel said the EO did not account for in assessing the commission’s ability to cover commissioner compensation.
Counsel also warned the EO may exceed the governor’s authority under the CNMI Constitution by altering the administration of a board created by statute. Counsel cited Public Law 20‑66, which established a five‑member Cannabis Commission, and noted that the CNMI Constitution provides removal for cause protections for board members. Counsel described Torres v. CUC, a CNMI Supreme Court decision involving a prior executive reorganization, as precedent the chamber should consider when assessing whether an EO can effectively nullify statutory boards.
During floor debate senators from both sides expressed concern about the timing and process of the EO and emphasized that changes to statutory boards should ordinarily be addressed by the Legislature. One senator summarized the chamber’s view that "if we want change, the governor's office and the Legislature should sit down and have real discussions" before sweeping reorganizations take effect. Another member raised the possibility that federal grant funding administered by the Department of Commerce could be jeopardized, because cannabis remains a controlled substance under federal law.
After debate the Senate voted to disapprove the executive order. The clerk reported the result as six votes to reject, one abstention and two absences; the president then announced the EO had been officially rejected. Counsel and multiple senators urged the Legislature to consider follow‑up legislation if the executive and legislative branches cannot reach agreement on appropriate administrative arrangements.
Next steps: The rejection prevents the EO from taking effect through legislative acquiescence. Senators discussed pursuing statutory changes in coordination with the House if the executive branch retains its current position; legal counsel advised that, if the houses do not reject the order within the 60‑day window, the transfer becomes effective and the Legislature would then need to act to alter administration by law.
