Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Gmcboard Overview topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Green Mountain Care Board outlines role and limits to Senate Health & Welfare Committee
Summary
Leaders of the Green Mountain Care Board told the Senate Health & Welfare Committee that the board regulates hospital budgets, qualified health plan rates and certificates of need but does not regulate Medicare, Medicaid or many employer self‑insured plans; they described recent legislative requirements and offered to return with staff for technical briefings.
Emily Brown, executive director of the Green Mountain Care Board, and board Chair Owen Foster briefed the Senate Health & Welfare Committee on Jan. 15 about the board’s mission, authorities and recent work.
The board said its mission is to drive systemwide improvements in access, affordability and quality. Brown described the board as an independent, five‑member body (six‑year staggered terms) that oversees hospital budget review, rate review for plans sold on Vermont’s exchange and certificate‑of‑need applications. “We have a data team at the board,” Brown said, describing repositories and analytic capacity that support board decisions.
Foster emphasized the limits of the board’s authority, telling the committee that Medicare, Medicaid and Medicare Advantage plans are regulated outside the GMCB’s purview. “Medicare is regulated at the federal level, and Medicaid is a federal and state run program,” Foster said, adding that employer self‑insured plans and some out‑of‑state providers are also outside the board’s regulatory reach.
Brown reviewed recent legislation that affects board work (see related reporting requirements and implementation steps), and offered to return with the board’s data director to brief the committee in more detail on ongoing IT and data projects.
The committee scheduled follow‑up briefings on several bills and requested technical follow‑up on implementation timelines and data connections; Brown said the board would return to provide additional detail and answer specific questions.
The board’s next procedural obligations include a February report to the legislature on reference‑based pricing and ongoing regulatory rulemaking tied to ACO certification and certificate‑of‑need thresholds.
