Fort Atkinson officials present facility and enrollment studies; middle school repairs estimated at $35.5 million
Loading...
Summary
Administrators told the board that a PRA facilities review and M.D. Roefer enrollment forecast show aging middle-school infrastructure (estimated $35,500,000 to reach code/safety minimums) and long-term enrollment declines; administration recommended keeping four elementary schools while exploring a 6–12 campus at Lexington Boulevard.
Administrators told the School District of Fort Atkinson Board of Education on Jan. 15 that two November reports — a PRA facilities assessment and an enrollment forecast from M.D. Roefer — paint a picture of aging infrastructure at the middle school and projected enrollment declines that warrant studying consolidation and long-range options.
"At the end of the report, the total cost to address the maintenance needs ... comes in at $35,500,000," an administrator said, noting that the PRA estimate is intended to "achieve a warm, safe and dry facility with minimal accessibility compliance" and does not include instructional upgrades or specialty areas such as athletics or pools.
The M.D. Roefer forecast reported the district served 2,246 students as of September 2025 and described a decline in recent years (report language: "declined 21 over the past decade"). The study projects modest housing growth (about 1,400 housing units by 2040) and a longer-term enrollment decrease described in the report as "an overall enrollment decline of 2 31 students over the next 15 years." Administrators urged caution in interpreting phrasing from the written reports and encouraged the public to review the full documents linked in the board packet.
Given those findings, administration presented several options for board feedback: remain committed to four high-performing neighborhood elementary schools (short term); investigate programmatic innovations (early learning, STEM, immersion programs) to attract and retain students; examine school-configuration options, including studying a 6–12 campus on the Lexington Boulevard property while maintaining distinct middle- and high-school identities; pause work on the South 4th Street property and focus study on Lexington Boulevard; and pursue civil-engineering and construction-manager planning if the board wishes to proceed.
Board members expressed a mix of support and caution. One member said repeatedly spending $35 million on temporary fixes was "not fiscally responsible," while others emphasized the opportunity to plan deliberately and to involve the community in redistricting or a future capital referendum. Administrators outlined a rough timeline: at least two years before a referendum question could go to the public and another two-to-three years for facilities to be ready if a major project were authorized.
No formal decisions were made; the board agreed to allow administration to study the options further and return with more detailed proposals and community engagement plans.
