Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board severs tax status from planning exemption to let new farms seek zoning relief sooner
Summary
The board unanimously approved text amendments to separate assessor agricultural classification (Title 42) from planning/zoning agricultural use exemptions (Title 11), allowing startups (for example wineries and small farms) to apply for zoning exemptions before meeting multi‑year tax classification criteria.
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Yavapai County supervisors unanimously approved a text amendment Dec. 17 to remove a requirement that applicants obtain agricultural tax classification from the assessor before seeking an agricultural use exemption from the county’s planning and zoning code.
Planner BJ Ratliff told the board the change clarifies that agricultural status for tax purposes (Title 42) is distinct from the planning exemption (Title 11) and that separating the two will reduce confusion for new operations that want to start on the land and obtain zoning relief without waiting multiple years for tax classification.
Assessor Ed Simmons and Taylor Rossi explained statutory criteria for agricultural classification — property used primarily for agriculture, in active production 3 of the last 5 years, a reasonable expectation of profit, and unitary management for noncontiguous lands — and outlined acreage thresholds for certain categories (e.g., 20 gross acres for cropland, 10 acres for permanent crops). Simmons said some smaller vineyards or specialized operations have been approved on a case‑by‑case basis, but the separation of planning and tax processes will reduce administrative friction for startups.
Board members asked about agritourism and safety/permitting for structures that may attract the public; staff acknowledged a “gray area” around agritourism where commercial permitting and building safety remain important and said they will refine language in future drafts.
The board closed the hearing and voted to adopt the text amendments as recommended by staff and the Planning & Zoning Commission.
