Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stormwater Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City approves transfer of Triangle Drain from Bureau of Reclamation to Grand Junction
Summary
The council unanimously adopted Ordinance 52-89 to accept ownership and easements for the Triangle Drain — infrastructure that now carries urban stormwater for nearby subdivisions — with staff saying expected initial maintenance costs are low.
Grand Junction City Council on Wednesday adopted Ordinance No. 52-89, approving an agreement with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and the Grand Valley Water Users Association to transfer ownership and nonexclusive easements for the Triangle Drain to the city.
Public works staff described the facility as originally built by the Bureau of Reclamation in the early 1900s to convey agricultural return and seep water but now carrying primarily urban stormwater serving portions of the Party Heights, Vista Del Norte and Apple Crest subdivisions. Staff said the transfer is necessary because the Bureau is not authorized to operate urban stormwater facilities.
Trent, the presenting staff member, told council the city will receive the drain and an easement and that physical impacts are minimal. He said prior inspections (including video inspection and locating a lost manhole) indicated the city can manage the facility and that expected ongoing maintenance will be limited to weed control and periodic ditch and pipe cleaning: "we anticipate this being relatively low maintenance," he said.
Council Member Stout moved adoption on final passage; Council Member Wynne seconded. A roll-call vote was unanimous, 7–0.
Why it matters: transferring the facility clarifies operational responsibility for stormwater infrastructure in an area that has urbanized since the drain was built; ownership simplifies regulatory oversight and places maintenance responsibility with the city.
Next steps: staff will record the transfer, integrate the facility into stormwater operations, and carry out routine maintenance and any repair work deemed necessary by future inspections.
Motion details: Ordinance No. 52-89 was adopted on final passage (mover: Council Member Stout; second: Council Member Wynne; vote 7–0).
