Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Standing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning and Zoning upholds zoning officer's standing decision in Coulter appeal
Summary
The Sandoval County Planning and Zoning Commission on Jan. 13 upheld a zoning officer's administrative decision that Thomas Coulter lacked automatic standing to appeal a proposed zone change, rejecting a motion to reinstate a joint appeal with co-appellant Martha Christopher. Coulter may still appeal to the County Commission.
The Sandoval County Planning and Zoning Commission voted Jan. 13 to uphold the zoning officer's administrative interpretation that an appellant must meet the county's standing criteria — including the 100-foot proximity test — to automatically qualify to appeal a zoning action.
Janet Cunningham Stevens, the county planner, told the commission staff recommended upholding the zoning officer because Coulter's property sits roughly 497 feet from the parcel at issue and therefore falls outside the 100-foot notification buffer specified in the comprehensive zoning ordinance. Janet read into the record an e-mail from a resident arguing the county has accepted joint and out-of-range appeals in other cases, but staff maintained the officer followed the current ordinance in this instance.
Appellant Thomas Coulter argued he and co-appellant Martha Christopher should have been allowed to file a joint appeal and urged the commission to consider past practice and whether required certified notification had been sent to nearby owners. Coulter also cited prior appeals related to the Diamond Tail project as precedent for accepting appeals from people beyond 100 feet.
Deputy County Attorney John Butchart told the commission the ordinance sets four discrete modifiers for standing: the property owner, a representative of certain public entities, owners within 100 feet, and any other person or organization that can show they are "especially and adversely affected." Butchart said whether Coulter met the "especially and adversely affected" prong would depend on the record and evidence presented.
Commissioner Steve Conrad moved to reverse the zoning officer's interpretation and allow Coulter and Christopher to proceed jointly; the motion was seconded but failed. A subsequent motion to uphold the zoning officer's decision passed on a roll call vote (six in favor, one opposed). The chair and staff noted Coulter retains the right to appeal the commission's ruling to the Sandoval County Commission under the ordinance's review-on-the-record process.
The commission's action related strictly to the zoning officer's administrative determination on standing and joint filing; it did not rule on the merits of the underlying zone-change application, which may be considered separately by the county commission.
