Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates Metropolitan Redevelopment Area governance and whether to create a citizen MRA commission
Summary
Staff briefed council on the Metropolitan Redevelopment Area framework and tools (including tax-increment financing and public-private partnerships). Councilors and public commenters debated transparency and whether an advisory or citizen-led MRA commission should be created to review redevelopment applications.
Los Alamos County staff reviewed progress on establishing Metropolitan Redevelopment Areas (MRAs) in the town site and White Rock and explained the statutory framework and tools available under the state Metropolitan Redevelopment Act.
Miss Brent (staff) reminded council that ordinances previously established MRA boundaries and that the next step is to consider whether council should delegate review authority to a separate MRA commission or retain decision authority at the council level. "The governing body, which in this case is the council, has all the authority, to make those decisions," staff said when describing the statutory structure.
Councilors raised transparency and timing concerns and asked about notice to property owners, the value of a citizen commission (expertise in commercial real estate, architecture, and affordable‑housing finance) versus potential delays introduced by an added review step, and what operations would look like if a citizen panel issued non‑recommendations. Staff cautioned that rural application volume is likely limited and that populating and maintaining a qualified volunteer commission can be challenging.
Public commenters urged a citizen‑led MRA commission to increase independent oversight and recommended including local entrepreneurs on the panel. Several public speakers also raised concerns about closed meetings in earlier redevelopment conversations; staff reiterated that council decision items and public hearings would be publicly noticed.
Council did not adopt a change; staff said they had opened an application process and anticipated two to three pre‑applications in coming months and will return with options if council wants to pursue a commission or ordinance change.
