Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Brewer Arena Project topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Parks board narrowly backs Brewer Arena ADA upgrades, grandstand design; stakeholders raise cost and program-use concerns

Parks and Recreation Board · December 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Parks and Recreation Board voted 4–2 to recommend the Brewer Arena ADA and grandstand improvement package — including a 10-row, 768-seat grandstand with 8 wheelchair spaces and chip-seal horse-friendly walkways — to County Council, after stakeholders debated size, cost and funding source trade-offs.

The Los Alamos Parks and Recreation Board voted 4–2 to recommend the Brewer Arena improvement package to County Council, advancing a conceptual design that includes ADA upgrades, a replaced grandstand with improved sightlines for wheelchair users, and chip-seal walkways as the recommended horse-friendly surface.

County project lead Mr. Naranjo presented design changes and costs: raising the elevation of some grandstand seating to improve wheelchair sightlines, centering the grandstand, a 15-foot setback from the arena fence, shallower seating steps with handrails, and an option to enlarge pavilion coverage over front seating for about $28,000. The county described a grandstand footprint of about 3,600 square feet with 768 seats plus eight wheelchair spaces and estimated a construction/renovation package in the multi-hundred-thousand to multi-million-dollar range depending on options; staff proposed remodeling the existing restroom facility (estimated ~$200,000) rather than installing vault toilets.

A major technical question was sidewalk material and horse safety. The county presented three surface types — hot-mix asphalt, chip seal and stamped asphalt — and reported a short straw-poll of users (10 responses) which favored chip seal as a balance of friction, durability and accessibility. Stakeholder representatives (Lasoa/Elweg) said their preference would be crusher-fines or compacted gravel where feasible but that they accepted chip seal among the three permanent options presented; they also stressed the county should avoid designing sidewalks that impede stable access and day-to-day operations for stable licensees.

Several equestrian representatives and other public commenters urged alternatives to the large permanent grandstand as proposed: build a smaller permanent grandstand with accessible seating and rely on portable bleachers (rented or county-owned) for peak rodeo attendance. Stakeholders said that approach would reduce the share of ADA/compliance funding spent on a facility used at full capacity only a few days a year. Staff responded that the capital funding for the project is in the county CIP bucket and that the arena is a unique venue warranting higher priority for ADA improvements.

After discussion the board moved the recommendation to forward the project to County Council for review and approval. Roll call: Member Schoffer (yes), Member Marsden (yes), Member Nepper (yes), Member Bowman (no), Member Cohen (no), Chair Watkins (yes). The motion passed 4–2. Staff said a task order reflecting refined contractor costs and final design elements will be presented to County Council in the coming months with public-comment opportunities at that stage.