Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Poultry Regulations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Northborough Board of Health reviews draft poultry rules, considers larger flock limits by lot size
Summary
The Northborough Board of Health reviewed a draft regulation proposing tiered maximum flock sizes tied to lot-size categories, discussed permit years and inspection authority, and agreed to seek town-council approval and a public hearing (tentatively Jan. 13).
The Northborough Board of Health on Dec. 9 reviewed a draft local regulation setting minimum standards for keeping chickens and other poultry, including proposed changes to maximum flock sizes tied to lot-size tiers.
The draft, presented by board staff, draws on a MAHB template and input from neighboring towns and the state poultry program. The presenter told the board that "both Megan and Jen recommended that you increase the maximum number of chickens" for some lot-size categories, and that the state poultry program recommended higher limits in certain tiers to support bird welfare.
Why it matters: backyard poultry rules affect where residents may keep hens, how many they may keep, and how the town inspects for public-health risks. Several board members said unclear tier language could invite requests for variances or create enforcement problems, and asked staff to clarify confusing phrasing before the rule goes to town council.
Key details discussed included: a recommendation for a calendar-year permit (Jan. 1–Dec. 31); proposed flock-range examples mentioned by staff (e.g., higher caps such as 4–6 birds in some tiers); the need to align lot-size cutoffs (fractions such as 1/8, 1/4, 1/2 acre) without overlapping "up to" language; and an explicit inspection authority allowing the animal-control officer to inspect coops and areas where poultry are kept. Staff said the draft will be discussed with town counsel and taken to town council for formal approval, with hearing date tentatively Jan. 13, subject to scheduling.
Board members also questioned a proposed variance standard that would allow a variance only when strict enforcement would "constitute a manifest injustice," calling that phrase vague and asking staff to seek legal clarification. The board noted a $1,000 fine appeared in the draft and emphasized the need to avoid drafting that would allow industrial production techniques (for example, post-molting practices used in commercial production) in backyard settings.
What happens next: staff will refine the draft to resolve ambiguous tier language, consult town counsel on the variance standard, publish notice as required, and return with a hearing date to town council. The board did not adopt the regulation on Dec. 9; it remains subject to further revision and council approval.
